The Western Society of Naturalists is driven by a kind of unstated credo, personified by the students of Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, where I started graduate school one million years ago. Biologicos ambulantes is what we used to call it (I first heard this term from a forever biologist named Mark Silberstein). The idea is that you are hooked. You will always do marine biology, so don't pretend. You will move to wherever you can support yourself doing science. Graduate students at Moss Landing sleep in the backs of trucks. On old professors' floors, wherever they can. They party hard all night, and then get up the next day in time for the first lecture at 8AM.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Biologicos Ambulantes
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Transitions
The last few days have been crazy. Sunday I came off island with a raggedy-ann poster in my computer. The three of us have been trying desperately to get the data we need to make our points. Some luck came our way. The last caged lobster ate a sea hare, and the other cage with no lobster still had its original 5 sea hares. Now we write. But first, John and Dan had to pull out the cages and store them in a safe place. We will be deploying them again, as soon as we get our feet under us.
Here’s an embedded jpeg of our poster. John has printed out the 3’X4’ version, and will soon bring it to Venice for our drive to Monterey.
You can clearly see how damn BUSY this thing is. Blame it on the alternative hypotheses!
Every poster I’ve ever done had too much writing, and this one is a prime example. Dan will be standing up there ready to explain the poster in words to anyone passing by.
Pretend you are one of them. Oh, jeez, I'll never see all the posters I want if I stop here!
Maybe I will stop for a second, though. The map looks pretty cool (now click on the image and get the close-up; admit it, we've caught you)
Ok. Fine. You move on. I don't care. The behavioral findings in the first 3 figures are still the sexiest damn story I’ve been involved with for a long time. We are completely stoked.
So in an hour or so, John and Dan will show up, and we’ll drive my Prius up to Monterey, posters in hand!
Day before yesterday, I came off the supply boat at Fisherman's Cove, loaded with champagne and fruit for fruit salad, and “Jack S. Fogbound” fixings. I had invited Gerry Smith, our treasured Diving Officer, and a slew of other staff from the marine lab, over for lunch. We took pictures, and I toasted everyone. While the boys put away all the diving stuff and stored the cages, I made fruit salad and Jack S Fogbounds. The latter is an unbelievable sandwich that was invented by Shirley Brokaw in the early 60s when her husband and two boys (my buddies) owned a 26 foot tugboat with a tiny stove. You take a small French bread roll, cut it, smear it with mustard and mayonnaise, a couple of slices of the best salami you can buy, some sharp sharp Canadian cheddar from Trader Joes, some onions, then close it up in a sheet of aluminum foil. Pop 8 of them into a small oven at 350 degrees until it starts smelling nice (ca 15 min), and then serve to your 8 guests. If its cold, these sandwiches warm your hands as you unwrap them. Mmmmmmmm good, they are.
I toasted the staff for all their help, but mainly I toasted Dan and John. These two guys have been working like madmen for 9 weeks on this project, and earned not a dime. I am eternally grateful for that. Twas a rich wonderful campaign.
Then we kicked them out, went for “one last swim” (a Siwash tradition), and headed home to Alamitos Bay.
Worked 16 hours on the poster yesterday, and now we leave. Whew. Getting too old for this.
Monday, November 9, 2009
TestingAlternateHypotheses!
We’re desperately trying to finish two posters for the Western Society of Naturalists Meeting. It is coming right up.
We have now actually tested several alternative hypotheses consistent with these attack observations.
1. 1.) Lobsters are attacking because there is something in the water (perhaps crowding pheromones, for example) that directly makes them more aggressive. Rob, Howard, Chris
Test: Lobsters that attacked in the reserve were held in identical lab conditions as lobsters from outside the reserve.
This figure shows that lobsters caught off the preserve (we did not test these behaviorally, but their responses were 94% certain to be “no pounce”.) needed to starve in the lab for 7 days before they would attack a sea hare. The attack readiness of lobsters from inside the reserve depended on their behavior. Lobsters that did not attack proffered sea hares in the field waited statistically just as long as the outsiders. Lobsters that DID attack sea hares inside the reserve were ready to eat in the lab much sooner (a little more than 2 days). Because the conditions were identical in these experiments, the lobster’s state, rather than something about its environment seems to be driving its behavior.
2.) Lobsters that fail to attack a sea hare are just not hungry (Klaus). We finally tested this experiment with three dives, and it wasn’t nearly as scary as we thought it was. 86% percent of sea hares that showed no interest in sea hares, nevertheless pounced upon and ate (attacked) the shrimp we offered them. This isn’t a complete negation. These no-pouncers do appear to be a bit more shy about shrimp than the attackers, 100% of whom ate the shrimp. Nevertheless, it appears to be primarily the unacceptable taste of sea hares, rather than a general aversion to eating, that explains the absence of pounce/attack behavior.
3.) Lobsters only eat sea hares because they are dropping out of the sky. Attached, “normal” sea hares would be unappealing (Rob and John).
Our cage results are in. We performed 7 different control enclosure experiments, i.e., provisioned for 1 or 2 days cages with 5 sea hares in them. We lost no sea hares (!) in these controls. By contrast, when we enclosed lobsters which showed attack behavior, we found that 6 of the nine enclosed lobsters ate at least one sea hare, and some ate as many as 4 animals per day!
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Things that go bump in the night.
I have a good friend who was once swallowed to the chest by a great white shark erupting from below him as he treaded water off Point Conception. The shark spit him out in mid air, and he miraculously survived. I heard the story from him a couple of years later, and as he bent his legs into the position they were caught in by the shark, the scars came scarily into register, forming a perfect shark jaw.
But what really sticks with me is when he said that the only inkling he had that the beast was organic, and not some inanimate submarine or torpedo, was that he could feel the torque of the tail strokes as the shark rose out of the sea. I have no idea how Rob ever gets back in the water after that, and have nothing but awestruck admiration for his continued “waterman” existence.
Monday, November 2, 2009
Experiments widen perspective
Ocean is like glass. The Catalina Flyer is flying. I’ve just done my tet-a-tet with John and Dan; they coming to Catalina on the same boat I’m taking to the mainland. The boys are back from their Halloween activities to do some more research. Last night was very exciting. We’ve finally gotten our cages right, but, up till last night, still no data!
I managed to talk a CSU Long Beach grad student, Stephen Trbovitch, into diving with me, so we could end our latest cage-enclosure experiment.
Early afternoon, two days ago (two days after the gale), Dan and I planted 5 sea hares in the two now sea-hare tight cages. Couldn’t dive on them night before last, but last night Steven and I checked out the damage. Cage 2 still had 5 sea hares. Rats. They had all crawled up on the ceiling. The lobster was right next to a group of three of them, looking like he was ready to pounce. But we ended the experiment anyway. Caught and measured this not-so-hungry lobster and let him go.
Then, we went to Cage 1. This cage had only 2 sea hares! This is very cool, for the cage itself is now fully sea-hare tight. So this is our first unequivocal evidence that lobsters will hunt down sea hares that have had time to settle down. Again, we measured the lobster, and let him go.
So, this result means that Rob’s (see alternative hypothesis blogs) alternative that lobsters are only attacking sea hares cause we are dropping them out of the water column, is weakened. This also means that the student’s “handout” alternative hypothesis is weakened. The captured lobster in Cage 1 had to first shake off the insult of being captured and constrained in a cage. Then he had to forage for his dinner. He found the sea hares in a way he has never before done, not even remotely resembling a gift from a diver happening by with a handout.
So, Stephen and I set up the next replicate experiment. We went searching for attacking lobsters, and found a monster. Put him into cage 1, left cage 2 with no lobster as a control, and went back to the surface. Steven went to the Halloween party. I tested lobsters in our waterfront tanks (more on that later), and then worked on the poster for the meeting in Monterey weekend after next. It’s coming along, but time is running out. I foresee panic setting in this week.
Here’s the map Dan’s been working on (rough draft. I know, the legend colors are wrong). You can see the location (pink circles) of our 7 dives outside reserves and 14 dives inside them. Next comes the attack data as a function of location. Stay tuned!
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Humbled by Gale
Today on my swim, I enter the cove by the more sedate launch ramp. Hot windless morning, 3 days after the gale. I wade into the mighty chilly water. Oh my, it’s up to my thigh, oh fiddle it’s up to my middle. Ventilating now. I launch my crawl stroke. Fast, and breathless. Just a bit of brain freeze. That’s a first. Stroking hard to catch up to the cold. The storm must have turned over some water, and the crisp air since then has not let the water temperature bounce back much. Water is really clear, but also really full of drift kelp. Floating everywhere. Out I crawl, past the first set of moorings. There are my kelp bass greeters. There are the bat rays. Woah there’s a really BIG one. Out past the stern of Siwash. There are our two cages. I can see one sea hare through the mesh on the ceiling, but it is too far away to see all five of them. Maybe the attacking lobsters we put in the two cages ate a sea hare or two. Sure hope so. But they were pretty small little attackers. We’ll see tomorrow when the boys get back. They are off for Halloween weekend, perhaps the most important party weekend for people under 30.
Just like Stuart, I think I know my pond pretty well by now, having sailed back and forth across it many times.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
How to restore an ecosystem
Heading across the channel from Catalina. Another 5 days gone. A chunk of work accomplished. We are seeing the end of the time looming. We can also see the body of work that is taking shape.
A few days ago, we did a lot of cage work. I’ll tell you about it later. But today, I want to start with this really cool observation, because it takes me somewhere worth considering.
While we were working during the day, placing cages and stocking them, etc., we noticed some REALLY big and REALLY curious sheepshead. These fish don’t get so big outside the preserve. They are caught by humans before they can grow that big. Here, though, there are some massive fish, with really big white grindey teeth. Just the right size to poke through the 1/8 inch mesh of our second cage design. These could very well be our Monster from Iron Bound Bay. We intended to replenish the cage to 5 sea hares, but I figured we had a “learnable moment”, so I offered one of the sea hares up to the biggest sheephead. SLURP, in it went. SPIT, out it flew. Then the teeth came out, BITE, out comes the ink. SHAKE, SLURP, and the sheephead swims away, John chasing and filming. The big fish spit and slurped a few more times, and then slurped for good. Goodbye mr sea hare. Thanks for teaching us something. Sorry you had to die.
Check out this movie:All this was pretty humbling to my lobster-centric view of things. Here was a very mobile sharp-eyed sight predator, whose presence would seem to be anathema to sea-hare survival. It raises the awkward question of the relative impact of sheephead vs lobsters on not only sea-hare abundance, but the community in general.
Actually, this kind of realization is what most community ecologists confront from time to time. Most ecologists tend to work with “what’s there”, that is the beasts you think are the players in a system. But there is always a chance that you are looking in the wrong place. That the REAL driver of the system is something else, a bacterium you don’t have the tools to study, an extinct species, or an over-fished species.
This doesn’t mean your conclusions are not correct, but it does threaten them with irrelevance.
Here, we were, building that case that the shallow rocky near-shore environment, in the absence of human fishing pressure, develops a large, hungry horde of lobsters, which eats every animal in its path, including sea hares, but also species more destructive to the kelp forest, such as sea urchins.
Then, we watch this big ole sheephead chase after the released lobster (to no avail), and then eat our sea hare like a red-hot candy, and wonder, oops, there’s what we should be studying. This guy will eat everything. I bet he’d eat an urchin without batting an eye.
An old friend of mine (graduate student at Moss Landing Marine Labs and Scripps Institution of Oceanography), Bob Cowen, studied these beasts out a San Nicolas Island back in the 80’s. I didn’t really pay attention to his work, but remember him talking about the destructive powers of these big male sheephead. Now I see his point.
This all brings up a very important point from a management perspective. The California Department of Fish and Game has historically set size and bag limits according to a sort of “farmers” mind set. Let the fishermen take the biggest animals, but keep the breeders in good condition and everything will work out fine. In the case of sheephead, there’s a little biology that makes this algorithm work out well for the DFG. These fish change sex: they start life as a female, and when they are the biggest female “in the block”, they change to male and compete with other males for the females. Since there will always be enough males around to inseminate the females, we can set a pretty small size limit that won’t harm the breeding females, only the large males.
This is the population-level perspective. However, Paul Dayton, Jeremy Jackson, and a host of other smart naturalists decry this perspective. They want an ecosystem-level perspective. What counts to them is not the breeding potential of the fished species, but its ECOLOGICAL potential. In the case of sheephead, the species is not threatened. It has a passable yearly recruitment. It adjusts its age of sex change to conditions on the ground. Everything is OK, from a farming, or fisheries mindset. But these experienced, thoughtful, community ecologists say FOUL. You are robbing the sheephead of its natural ecological function. Even a low density of these big bad males, will keep all the primary consumers (e.g., urchins) at bay, eating the abundant ones long before they damage the kelp beds. So, with the fisheries approach, the population may be doing fine, but its EFFECTS on the community are a joke. They can’t shape the community as they have for millennia because they can’t grow big.
Same goes for lobsters. A big (say greater than 5 pounds) lobster is an entirely different beast than his sub-legal 1-lb son. The natural (pre-fishery) community has droves of these big guys (you can see that in the catches of the early part of the 20th century). These lobsters very likely ate everything.
Of course this is all a great big hypothesis, but it is pretty well supported.
So what do we do, Mr. Science? Well, I’m just a cranky ole blogger with some new data, but here’s what I think anyway.
The fisheries people can start by considering these animals (lobsters and sheephead), not as sea-going pigs, which have a “maximum sustainable yield,” but rather as shapers of the ecological community. You need these big guys around, regardless of gender, because they shape your community, making it much more like the pre-human one.
Jeez, Capn Bilge. Aren’t you asking a lot of Joe Fisherman, who just wants his right to catch a fish, or bring up a delectable lobster?
Yes. But this HAS been done before. There is a doable pathway to this place. It starts with something called “slot limits.” This means you take only a particular size RANGE: nothing smaller than 3 ¼” carapace for lobster, but at the same time, nothing LARGER than say 5” carapace. There is already a little discussion about slot limits on spiny lobsters. Conspicuously absent from that discussion is the role of large lobsters as community shapers. Instead, most of the discussion regards a different consequence of large females; they produce orders of magnitude more eggs.
Both effects, together, make the argument overwhelming: 10-100 times more eggs released per square kilometer, and better control of urchin outbreaks. Slot limits rock. Let’s do it!
Too complex, you say. Can’t make the recreational fishing industry retool like that.
Yes we can. It has already been done. The trout fishery has TOTALLY done this. They have slot limits, and EVERYONE obeys them. Fishermen still CATCH the large individual, i.e., bigger than the slot. But then they take a picture and LET HIM GO! All over the Rockies the fishing people PRIDE themselves in this. There is almost a religion about preserving the big guys (maybe we should get Robert Redford to make a movie, “A reef runs through it” to give the lobster a human face). The river outfitters understand that it is these big bull trout, caught and released over and over again, that bring their business back to them, year after year.
By contrast, on Catalina, a lot of the poaching is by the people (not the majority, but a good chunk) who live at Catalina. You can see them out poaching every night. There is a titillating game of warden go seek. This is crazy. The locals should be the caretakers of the big bulls, not their assassins!
Ok. Here’s how we do this. “Give” the people of Catalina the Isthmus Reef. Nobody is allowed to fish for sheephead OR lobster on Isthmus Reef without a local Catalina resident on board. Pay for the resident warden to go to fishery school for a year, and pay them through fishing fees. Then let them oversee the protection of the “Big Bulls” on Isthmus Reef. Inform all the cattle boats with recreational fisherman, and get them on board. Put buoys around the reef with signs laying out the rule. No fishing without a guide. If you don’t have a guide you have to go somewhere else. Some macho fisherman from the mainland comes over, and tries to sneaks out with a big guy from the reef has a problem. Someone on the island, not necessarily even a deputized warden, catches this poacher, and he is in big trouble, and not just because of the fine. He gets a heartfelt tongue-lashing from someone who has grown to be proud of their reef full of “big bulls”.
Let the public fish the other spots without a guide, but give the responsibility of guarding Isthmus Reef to the residents. Pretty soon, something happens. People don’t want to catch a bunch of small lobsters and sheephead to take home. They want to catch a BIG beast. They pay extra money to fish or dive on Isthmus Reef, with a local guide. They bring home pictures. The word spreads. The reef has some MONSTERS. The island has employment. More and more Islanders get work as guides. But even more important the island has PRIDE. Pretty soon the present-day sub-culture of poaching changes to a energetic, even fanatical, culture of protection.
Please note that this is NOT a Marine Life Protected Area idea. That idea, as important as it is, does not integrate well with local culture. The idea of an outside authority imposing its will on the locals, many of whom have grown up in these waters, is proving itself to be too abrasive to fully function in cultural settings like Catalina. This idea is much more internal, and organic. Something like this has already been done on tropical pacific islands with the giant clam. I can’t remember the reference, but local communities pitch together to protect their cherished brood stock, close to their community, from would-be poachers. Seems totally parallel to the Catalina Island situation. Let’s do it guys. Come on Catalina! I bet you could make this work and REALLY put Two Harbors on the map.
Wow. The ferry just arrived. What a diatribe I’ve perpetrated. Sorry. Last time, I promise.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Lighten up
You can tell we’re transitioning from how to do the research to how to present it. Here’s one way. It is a drop-dead gorgeous morning, glassy. I’m in the Catalina Express heading from the Isthmus, where they picked me up, to Howland’s Landing a little farther west, where we pick up 100 screaming kids from the camp.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Trying again.
Last night, John and I dove on the cage that Dan and I had deployed the day before. Fear and loathing in my heart. I noticed the gaps in the cage doors the day before, and figured those busy-body sea hares would just march right through them. When John arrived from the mainland, I bitched and moaned about the gaps as we started making the second cage. Different people around the Marine Lab had different suggestions. A student in the CSU zoology class out here suggested we just make it so the meshes overlap when the door is closed. The doors don’t really close like that. They are on loose zip-tie hinges, not solid ones. I got the idea of sewing a drawstring to the hatch and having a little Santa bag entrance to the cage to put rocks and lobsters in and out. The driver for the supply boat said cut some hose lengthwise and put them on the PVC to make a tighter fit.
Will the cage be ripped to shreds like the last time? If so, let’s pull it up and bring it back to dry land and get drunk.
What if it only has one hole? Ok, we mend it underwater.
What if all 5 sea hares escape? We put on the hoses and come back to the dock and get more sea hares.
What if 2 sea hares escape? We put on the hoses and go find an attacking lobster.
What if zero sea hares escape? We put on the hoses and go find an attacking lobster.
What if we can’t get the hoses on underwater? We take off the doors and ascend to the whaler and work on them there. Then go find an attacking lobster.
Friday, October 23, 2009
If at first you don't succeed...
So, my hypothesis is that first, the lobster ate one of the sea hares enclosed with him in the cage.
This film is of us deploying the improved cage. I think you can see the cage eater, if you look very closely. Note the daring absence of wet suits (a short dive on a sunny day).
Thursday, October 22, 2009
The monster from Iron Bound Bay
My dad was a scary man. He could scare the daylights out of you. As kids, one of the highlights of coming over to Howland’s Cove on Catalina for the weekend was after dinner. My two brothers and I would beg and beg, and finally the old man would relent, and tell us a scary story. Actually my big brother Howard really wanted to hear the scary stories, but Ricky and I were not so sure we wanted one, but we went along with Howard anyway. I don’t know if Dad was tapping oral traditions, or just making shit up. He once told us about a star-crossed couple, just married, who were found embraced, dead as door nails on the point at Lion’s Head (this same point marks the boundary between the Invertebrate No Take zone to the west and the recreational lobster fishery on the Isthmus side; see earlier maps). The lovers were both buried there on Lion’s Head, side-by-side by their next of kin, as a warning to other lovers to “watch out”.
I do, we leave, and that’s that.